|
Post by birdnerd on Jan 25, 2017 16:35:23 GMT -5
For my second vet reference, I have the choice between a vet who I worked with at the same clinic as my first vet referees, or a vet I've only been working with for the last 2 weeks.
Obviously I have been with the first choice longer, but I have heard it is a bit of a negative to have both references from the same clinic. Should I go with the second option, the most recent (but not as much experience with) vet? Or am I overthinking this?
In terms of quality, I feel like they could both write me great recommendations, but I know the first vet would obviously know me better as I was there longer.
|
|
|
Post by katherinexox on Jan 25, 2017 18:02:46 GMT -5
I don't see why you wouldn't be able to use the first referee. What matters is that it's two different people right? That's what I'm doing because I'd rather use someone who knows me well even if it's the same clinic.
|
|
|
Post by lowenger on Jan 27, 2017 9:17:52 GMT -5
Quality first
|
|